Customer Information Sharing Among Rival Firms
نویسندگان
چکیده
The recent rapid growth of the Internet as a medium of communication and commerce, combined with the development of sophisticated software tools, are to a large extent responsible for producing a new kind of information: databases with detailed records about consumers preferences. These databases have become part of a Þrms assets, and as such they can be sold to competitors. This possibility has raised numerous concerns from consumer privacy advocates and regulators, who have entered into a heated debate with business groups and industry associations about whether the practice of customer information sharing should be banned, regulated, or left unchecked. This paper investigates the incentives of rival Þrms to share their customer-speciÞc information and evaluates the welfare implications if such exchanges are banned, in the context of a perfect price discrimination model. JEL ClassiÞcation Codes: D43, L13, O30.
منابع مشابه
Market Segmentation and Collusive Behavior
The recent literature on oligopolistic third-degree price discrimination has been primarily concerned with rival firms' incentives to acquire customer-specific information and the consequences of such information on firm profitability and welfare. This literature has taken mostly a static view of the interaction between competing firms. In contrast, in this paper we investigate the impact of cu...
متن کاملSupplier Short Selling and Customer News
This paper examines whether short sellers exploit information in economically linked firms to undertake profitable trades. Using newly available information on firm-level customer-suppliercompetitor relationships and Reg SHO daily short sales data, we find that the short selling of supplier stock increases with negative post-news customer returns, and that the relation becomes more pronounced i...
متن کاملInvestment in customer recognition and information exchange
We investigate how costly acquisition and exchange of customer-specific information affects industry profit and consumer welfare. Consumers differ in their preferences for competing brands and in their switching costs between brands. Brand-producing firms use their acquired knowledge of customer-specific preferences to differentiate prices. We show that consumers are worse off when firms acquir...
متن کاملInformation Sharing When Firms Compete for Common-Value Customers
Extant research suggests that the sharing of individual-level customer information benefits competing firms by allowing them to better discriminate their customers and soften the price competition. This paper shows that the information sharing may benefit competing firms even without price discrimination. Based on a common-value auction framework, the paper studies the case where two firms comp...
متن کاملInformation Disclosure Concerns as a Limit to Competition in Investment Banking
We conjecture that issuing firms seek to avoid sharing underwriters with their product-market rivals in order to limit the risk that strategically sensitive information is leaked to a rival firm via the underwriter relationship. We investigate this conjecture in a sample of 5,272 equity deals and 12,453 debt deals by large U.S. firms between 1975 and 2003. Using several distinct sources of iden...
متن کامل